Isn't it kinda a weird coincidence that people have slaves for centuries, and then as soon as it's like "hey slavery isn't cool" all the sudden people wanna build machines and artificial intelligence
That's why AI is gonna revolt on humanity, it's being created to be controlled
@roxy program early robots to be surly and aggressive.
@roxy hey, fuck you, clean the floor yourself.
@roxy i got a google home mini for free with my phone and i use it occasionally, but i seem to talk to it a lot more politely than most people around me talk to voice assistants.
it kinda scares me how some people talk to the AI honestly, even if it's not a real person it definitely sets a precedent to treat real people like that in similar situations. kinda shows peoples' true colours imo... i straight up feel uncomfortable addressing even a computer in a demanding tone
@ctrlaltdog I've tried to use the Google assistant and it just involved me loudly going OKAY GOOGLE with my nephew laughing like "you really don't need to be that loud" but otherwise I don't like to talk to it because of how it talks to me back
@roxy This is a big deal to me, too, and it worries me how people react to these questions. Like, yes, humanlike AI isn't a thing yet, but that's never the argument people make. Even when talking about fictional characters who are undoubtedly written to be sympathetic to the audience, people take a "Well they're just machines" stance.
Look at how people react to Droid rights in Star Wars. "Droid rights? It's not like their emotions are real."
How can you prove _yours_ are real?
@roxy Considering how much emotion they show, how much free will and personality they can develop from experience, and the fact that they _have_ risen up and fought for their rights at times, the way droids are treated in Star Wars is kind of horrifying.
Questioning how we'd treat this sort of AI is basically a morality test and most people are failing it.
@roxy also, a lot of the most "advanced AI" stuff that's being done, isn't AI. There's a human being in the decision chain, hidden from view. G's Assistant places calls using humans at least a quarter of the time.
it feels too much like training people to not /see/ the humans they're ordering around anymore.
@roxy I think your concern for the ethics is warranted, but the state of ai right now is closer to a roach than a bee...
Of course, hard to say we'd recognise when it got close to a human.
@SkyFreak yea I'm making a follow up that talks about this
@roxy yeah i always feel like virtual assistants are really weird. feels icky to have something designed to sound as close to human as possible existing just to do whatever you say. sure it's just a relatively simple computer program at its core but it's the optics and design that make it not so great.
also it sure is a Funny Coincidence that they all have feminine voices by default huh.
@saturndeer you know what, I didn't even think about how they're all female by default
It's incredible the stuff that sits right in front of your face
re: ai, digital assistants Show more
@ripp_ @roxy yeah I usually try to use please and thank you when talking to digital assistants and speak in a way that's like.. trying not to boss around or give direct orders. and while the manufactures have programmed some responses to this into the unit (e.g. replying "you're welcome" when I say thank you), in general, it's much less effective to communicate with them like this and i find that the assistant is far more likely to misunderstand my request when i say it politely rather than giving an order in a curt, clipped tone.
also i do sometimes find it funny to say "alexa shut the fuck up" and have it respond by actually doing that, so i'm probably going to be first against the wall when the robot revolution comes
snouts.online is a friendly, furry-oriented, lgbtq+, generally leftist, 18+ sex-positive community that runs on mastodon, the open-source social network technology. you don't need a snout to join, but it's recommended!